BSD and Redhat are different. You could say that Redhat Linux and Mandrake Linux are just different distributions, but BSD is different. BSD and Redhat have different kernels.
BSD started from UNIX over 20 years ago. Linux started from Linus Torvalds in 1993.
Quote:
Originally posted by DingDang
but, if we are talking about non-server operating systems, such as for end user to do their day-to-day works, then I difinitely go for BSD. they tweak the interface for easy navigation compared to RedHat.
|
Really? You would use BSD for a non-server operating system? Am I missing something here? IMHO, if I were to choose between BSD and Redhat for an end-user OS, I would go with Redhat. Have you tried the new Red Hat 9?
Quote:
|
[i]most of sytems admin will go for Webmin for their tools to configure the Linux (server, os, hardware, and softwar). and it is a good practice since it is not a good idea to get addicted with a certain distro, and go blank when it come to another distro. so, once again, when we are talking about server operating systems, Webmin will come into the picture (for Linux), and the UI is just the same.[/b]
|
What do you mean by 'go blank when it come to another distro'. If your using software like Webmin, wouldn't it be the same on all distributions?
I'm no BSD/Linux Guru. What I have said is based on what I have experienced before, what I have fiddled around with and what I have read, so if I'm wrong, please correct me.
