
Originally Posted by
Seanie
It's good enough, I think. These aren't sites that some due process of law has decided are illegal, so any great effort would look like an aggression. Disabling name resolution will stop 99% of the people who might look. If there is an issue in law, then the 1% who circumvent the trivial block have made a 'special effort' to see it - they can't claim it was an accident. Either that, or they're nerds who are wondering why name resolution isn't working properly!
I still think blackholing the sites with NXDOMAIN is not right - it does just look 'broken'. I think they should resolve the name to a gov.my website that reminds the user of the ... prevailing attitudes to the content they're attempting to browse and that there's not really any such thing as anonymity.
I'd much rather they didn't interfere with content that isn't actually criminal at all, and encourage the ISPs to make available filtered feeds per consumer or free personal filtering software. I don't think there's any likelihood of that happening in Malaysia in the near future. I'm not sure any country has managed to avoid authoritarianism when it comes to net censorship, has it? I was in the UK recently, and Vodafone had some sort of 'opt out' scheme for their clean feed. I think the censorship scheme should be opt-in.